Page 1 of 1

6 Responses

  1. JMV

    I didn’t realize that Paul’s prototype was built with Epi parts! More ammo for when people say my Epiphone Les Paul isn’t a “real” Les Paul!

    There is a great interview with the man himself: http://www.musicianshotline.com/archive/interviews/lespaul1.htm

    Where he says, in reference to the Epiphone LP: “Oh yeah, they play equally as well and sound equally as well as the Gibson.”

    Also, thanks for using my pic w/ the article!

  2. GuitarBizarre

    I’m sorry, but trying to argue your budget version is the real thing is never going to work. Made from epiphone parts or not, the log was nothing like the gibson les paul, which as far as things are concerned is the only ‘real’ Les paul.

    Not only that, but back then gibson didn’t own epiphone and epiphone weren’t considered a ‘budget’ brad as they are today. They were a completely different company in almost everything but name.

    Not to mention, if you go out and play a good les paul then compare it to your epiphone, its going to kick crap out of it. (Note I say good les paul. Sadly, gibsons quality control of late is TERRIBLE. Need proof? http://www.musicbanter.com/talk-instruments/29602-heres-warning-anyone-even-thinking-looking-gibson-guitar.html)

  3. GuitarBizarre

    I disagree. We all know at least one budding guitarist with a squier, who makes a gigantic deal about how good it is because it says ‘squier by fender’ on the headstock. I understand the point you’re trying to make, but lets be honest, its not a real les paul and it never will be, so why put the idea in peoples heads?

    If nothign else it seems to go against the purpose of this site, because its not judging epiphone on its own merits but on how close its products are to another manufacturers. Surely thats anything but a good mark for the company?

Leave a Reply